elizabeth khoury art
  • Home
  • about
  • essays & stories
  • Projects
  • Musings

​Against the Ornamental: Why Art Must Provoke

Art should challenge, disrupt, and provoke. When it merely conforms—when it exists solely to decorate or please—it risks becoming another product of the status quo, stripped of its transformative potential. The most powerful art unsettles, forces confrontation, and demands that we see the world differently. It is not necessarily about being offensive or grotesque, but about unsettling assumptions, questioning authority, and exposing hidden truths.

Historically, art has served as a catalyst for change. The Dadaists responded to the horrors of World War I with absurdity and chaos, rejecting conventional aesthetics to reflect a world turned upside down. The Surrealists delved into the subconscious, undermining rational thought. Contemporary artists continue this legacy—whether through political commentary, subversive reimaginings of the body, or radical redefinitions of space and identity.

"Pretty" art, the kind that soothes rather than disturbs, can be enjoyable, even necessary at times. But when art becomes purely ornamental, it risks becoming complicit in reinforcing societal norms rather than interrogating them. True artistic power lies in its ability to disrupt, to create friction, to make people pause and rethink. Shock is not the goal in itself, but a tool—a means to break through the noise of everyday life and demand engagement.
​
To challenge ideas is to wield art as a force of resistance. Whether through discomfort, ambiguity, or direct confrontation, art must remain unpredictable, unsettling, and unapologetic. Anything less is decoration.
 
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • about
  • essays & stories
  • Projects
  • Musings